Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 April 20263372879

Land North of East End, Furneux Pelham, Hertfordshire SG9 0JT

Planning appeal 3372879 at Land North of East End, Furneux Pelham, Hertfordshire SG9 0JT (East Hertfordshire District Council) was dismissed on 30 April 2026 by Inspector Bowyer J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

‘erection of a four-bedroom self-build dwelling with carport, garage, access, parking and landscaping’

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Bowyer J
Postcode
SG9 0JT

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposal on the Hatfield Forest Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) and National Nature Reserve (NNR)

What decided it

The marked harm to the character and appearance of the rural area caused by the dwelling's excessive height, bulk and form relative to its surroundings, which would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the limited housing and economic benefits even under the tilted balance.

The limited benefits of housing supply contribution, self-build provision and economic benefits were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the marked harm to character and appearance contrary to Policies DES4 and GBR2 and Framework principles on design quality and local character, resulting in dismissal despite the Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy GBR2Policy DES4Policy NE1Policy ED2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

29 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in East Hertfordshire District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed19 October 20266009679
    Land to the West of Ginns Road, Ginns Road, Stocking Pelham, SG9 0JD
  2. Dismissed15 October 20266010602
    Duck Street Cottage, The Street, Furneux Pelham, SG9 0LA
  3. Allowed24 September 20266008238
    Land North of A507, West of A10, Buntingford, Buntingford, SG9 9ER
  4. Allowed23 September 20266007451
    The White House, Dane End, Ware, SG12 0LP
  5. Dismissed7 September 20266006819
    Land South Of The Street, Furneux Pelham, SG9 0LD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.