Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 February 20263373293

Puttenham Golf Club, The Heath, Puttenham, Guildford, GU3 1AL

Planning appeal 3373293 at Puttenham Golf Club, The Heath, Puttenham, Guildford, GU3 1AL (Guildford Borough Council) was dismissed on 26 February 2026 by Inspector Goldberg V, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to any relevant development plan policies and the Framework.

conversion of golf course building to a residential dwelling and associated landscaping works following the demolition of two existing buildings, and associated works to the adjacent bridleway to facilitate vehicular access. This

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Goldberg V
Postcode
GU3 1AL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to any relevant development plan policies and the Framework
  • the effect of the proposal on Ancient Woodland
  • the effect of the proposal on protected species (bats) and their habitat
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, having particular regard to the effect on the Surrey Hills National Landscape (NL)
  • whether the proposal would be a suitable location for a dwelling
  • whether the proposal includes sustainable design and construction principles
  • whether the proposal would result in the loss of an area of designated open space
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the Very Special Circumstances (VSC) required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The potential destruction of irreplaceable ancient woodland habitat and harm to European Protected Species (bats) that cannot be adequately assessed or mitigated, combined with loss of designated open space, substantially and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of the proposal.

The benefits of developing a dilapidated site, contributing to housing supply, and conserving and enhancing the National Landscape were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the significant and irreversible adverse impacts on ancient woodland, protected species habitat, and designated open space.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy P2Policy P6Policy P1Policy D1Policy D4Policy ID3Policy D2Policy D14Policy D15Policy D16Policy ID5Policy ID4
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 193

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

28 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Guildford Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed15 October 20266008529
    Shortland Farm, Guildford Road, Ash, GU12 6DF
  2. Allowed14 October 20266009751
    Land South of Green Lane, West Horsley, GU23 6PQ
  3. Dismissed6 October 20266009810
    Hogs Back Farm Yard, Monkshatch, Compton, GU3 1DL
  4. Allowed5 October 20266012736
    The Cottage, Blanket Mill Farm, Goose Rye Road, Worplesdon, Guildford, GU3 3RQ
  5. Dismissed23 September 20266009962
    Pentire, The Avenue, Worplesdon, GU3 3RA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.