Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 January 20263374694

34 Penlands Crescent, Leeds, LS15 9DQ

addition of rooflights to front and dormer with window to rear to form rooms in roof space

Authority
Leeds City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Evans C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host property, the terrace it is part of and the immediate area

What decided it

The proposed dormer extension would significantly dominate the rear elevation of the host dwelling and terrace through its large scale and boxy flat roof design, creating unacceptable harm to character and appearance that conflicts with the development plan.

Plan policies cited: Policy P10 of the Leeds Core Strategy, Policy GP5 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan (Review 2006), Policy BD6 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan (Review 2006)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.