Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 February 20263375358

70 Salisbury Road, Harrow, HA1 1NZ

Planning appeal 3375358 at 70 Salisbury Road, Harrow, HA1 1NZ (London Borough of Harrow) was dismissed on 5 February 2026 by Inspector Armstrong N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to refuse and cycle storage.

single-storey side and rear infill extension, hip-to-gable roof conversion and dormer extension and the change of use from a small HMO (Class C4) to a large HMO (sui-generis) with refuse and cycle storage

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Armstrong N
Postcode
HA1 1NZ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to refuse and cycle storage
  • whether or not the development would provide a satisfactory standard of accommodation for its future occupiers, with particular regard to outlook, privacy and light to bedrooms and communal areas
  • the effect of the development on the living conditions of neighbouring residents, with particular regard to noise and disturbance

What decided it

The proposed cycle storage would harmfully affect the character and appearance of the area by introducing an incongruous structure in a prominent location where similar development is absent, and the development would not provide satisfactory privacy standards for future occupants of rooms 02 and 03.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D3Policy D14Policy DM 1Policy DM 26Policy DM 30

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

461 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Harrow

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed22 October 20266013962
    2 Whitefriars Avenue,, Harrow Weald, HA3 5RN
  2. Allowed5 October 20266011608
    6 Mead Close, Harrow Weald, Harrow, HA3 5JN
  3. Dismissed30 September 20266005822
    Former National Grid Site, Marsh Lane, Stanmore, HA7 2SN
  4. Allowed27 August 20266009442
    36 St Kildas Road, Harrow, HA1 1QA
  5. Dismissed31 July 20266007726
    Moon & Sixpence, 250 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End, HA5 4HS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.