Planning appeal decision
22 Murrells Farm, Stanford Rivers, Ongar, Essex, CM5 9QE
Planning appeal 3375933 at 22 Murrells Farm, Stanford Rivers, Ongar, Essex, CM5 9QE (Epping Forest District Council) was allowed on 14 April 2026 by Inspector Heppell J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appeal site is grey belt and whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and development plan policies.
the demolition of a former farm building granted change of use to residential and the erection of a new dwelling to a similar mass and footprint
- Authority
- Epping Forest District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Heppell J
- Postcode
- CM5 9QE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the appeal site is grey belt and whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and development plan policies
- if inappropriate, the effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area with particular reference to the setting of nearby listed buildings
- whether the proposal would provide suitable living conditions for future occupiers with particular reference to the internal floor area
- the effect of the proposal on the integrity of the SAC
- if inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The fallback position of the extant prior approval for conversion of the farm building to residential use, combined with the visual enhancement and heritage benefits of the proposed replacement dwelling over the approved conversion, clearly outweighed the minor harm to Green Belt openness and established very special circumstances.
The minor harm to Green Belt openness and inappropriateness of the development was clearly outweighed by the visual enhancement of the site, improved character and appearance, neutral heritage impact, biodiversity and sustainability benefits, social and economic benefits, and the material fallback position of the extant prior approval.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP5Policy DM4Policy DM7Policy DM9Policy DM2Policy DM22
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 212
- Judgments
- Mansell v Tonbridge and Malling BC & others [2017] EWCA Civ 1314; Schneck v SSHCLG & West Berkshire DC [2022] EWHC 3335 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Epping Forest District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed28 October 20266011400Larksmead Nursery, St Leonards Road, Nazeing, EN9 2HQ
- Allowed27 October 20266008413Sparks Farm, Nine Ashes Road, Nine Ashes, CM4 0JZ
- Dismissed26 October 20266008699Denver Lodge, Waltham Road, Nazeing, EN9 2EB
- Dismissed23 October 20266013055Millers Farm, Epping Road, Roydon, Harlow, CM19 5DD
- Dismissed21 October 20266010759Spains Hall, Spains Hall Road, Willingale, Ongar, CM5 0QE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®