Intwood House , Acacia Park Drive , Rawdon, BD10 0PL

Planning appeal 3376447 at Intwood House , Acacia Park Drive , Rawdon, BD10 0PL (Leeds City Council) was dismissed on 11 March 2026 by Inspector Williams K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development is inappropriate in the Green Belt having regard to the effect on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt.

for the infilling of existing outdoor pool; demolition of associated sauna and plant room buildings, extension of parking area to front; new stone wall to match existing with balustrade to support car parking above and soft landscaping

Authority: Leeds City Council
Appeal type: householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure: Written Representations
Development: residential · Householder developments
Inspector: Williams K
Postcode: BD10 0PL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

Whether the development is inappropriate in the Green Belt having regard to the effect on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, including the Rawdon Cragg Wood Conservation Area and Special Landscape Area
If it is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The proposal would reduce the openness of the Green Belt by introducing a new permanent engineered parking platform into currently open space, and the other considerations advanced do not clearly outweigh this substantial harm.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies: Policy GP5Policy N33Policy N19Policy N37Policy P10Policy P11HDG 3
National Planning Policy Framework: Paragraph 153Paragraph 154

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

43 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision

An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter — Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.

Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app — Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.

Start your free trial

More decisions in Leeds City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

Allowed13 October 20266011132
Rei House Stables, Ripley Lane, Guiseley, LS20 9NY
Dismissed12 October 20266011503
Craven Bank, Harewood Road, Leeds, LS17 9HL
Dismissed27 August 20266009680
The Bradford Golf Club, Hawksworth Lane, Guiseley, LS208NP
Allowed12 August 20266005793
Breary Grange Farm, Kings Road, Leeds, LS16 9JN
Dismissed24 July 20266006233
Uplands Cottage, Back Lane, Leeds, LS12 5HL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.