Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 July 20263377097

10 Piccadilly, LONDON, W1J 0DD

Display of 1:1 printed image of building and 3x externally illuminated advertising areas measuring 18m x 8m on Piccadilly, Piccadilly Circus 18.4m x 7.5m on Piccadilly Circus and 14.72m x 8m on Regent Street shroud for a temporary period of two years

Authority
City of Westminster Council
Appeal type
commercial · Commercial Appeal Service (CAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
advertisement · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Cullen F

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the amenity of the area, having regard to the host listed building, the settings of nearby listed buildings and the character and appearance of the Regent Street Conservation Area

What decided it

The inset advertisement zone on the Piccadilly Circus elevation would appear excessively dominant and discordant on this elevation, overwhelming the trompe l'oeil depiction and causing harm to the amenity of the area having regard to the host listed building, nearby listed buildings' settings and the conservation area's character and appearance.

Framework references: 141

Plan policies cited: Policy 42, Policy 44, Policy 45, Policy 48G

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.