Planning appeal decision
10 Piccadilly, London, W1J 0DD
Planning appeal 3377097 at 10 Piccadilly, London, W1J 0DD (City of Westminster Council) was dismissed on 7 July 2026 by Inspector Cullen F, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the amenity of the area, having regard to the host listed building, the settings of nearby listed buildings and the character and appearance of the Regent Street Conservation Area.
Display of 1:1 printed image of building and 3x externally illuminated advertising areas measuring 18m x 8m on Piccadilly, Piccadilly Circus 18.4m x 7.5m on Piccadilly Circus and 14.72m x 8m on Regent Street shroud for a temporary period of two years
- Authority
- City of Westminster Council
- Appeal type
- commercial · Commercial Appeal Service (CAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- advertisement · Minor retail and services
- Inspector
- Cullen F
- Postcode
- W1J 0DD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the amenity of the area, having regard to the host listed building, the settings of nearby listed buildings and the character and appearance of the Regent Street Conservation Area
What decided it
The inset advertisement zone on the Piccadilly Circus elevation would appear excessively dominant and discordant on this elevation, overwhelming the trompe l'oeil depiction and causing harm to the amenity of the area having regard to the host listed building, nearby listed buildings' settings and the conservation area's character and appearance.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 42Policy 44Policy 45Policy 48G
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 141
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in City of Westminster Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed28 October 202660123391 Bear Street, London, WC2H 7DZ
- Allowed20 October 2026601497412 Dryden Street, London, WC2E 9NA
- Dismissed20 October 20266013735Gloucester Place, Opposite No. 16, London, W1U 8HA
- Allowed12 October 20266011165Avon House, 360-366 Oxford Street, London, W1C 1JN
- Dismissed12 October 20266010357Pitch 1696, Wardour Street, London, W1D 6BY
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®