Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 March 20266001298

34 Hall Street, Oldswinford, Stourbridge, DY8 2JE

Planning appeal 6001298 at 34 Hall Street, Oldswinford, Stourbridge, DY8 2JE (Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 19 March 2026 by Inspector Bromley N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the host property, with regard to its significance as a non-designated heritage asset (NDHA), and the character and appearance of the area.

demolish existing dwelling and replace with two detached dwellings

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Bromley N
Postcode
DY8 2JE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the host property, with regard to its significance as a non-designated heritage asset (NDHA), and the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The substantial harm to the non-designated heritage asset through its complete loss and the resulting visual harm to the street scene and Area of High Historic Townscape Value outweigh the modest benefits of housing delivery on a small brownfield site, even under the tilted balance.

The substantial harm to the NDHA and character and appearance of the area outweighed the modest benefits of housing delivery, renewable energy features, and efficient use of brownfield land, such that the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits when assessed against the Framework as a whole.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
ENV2ENV3L1S6S8S12
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 73Paragraph 131Paragraph 216

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

74 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Dudley

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed6 July 20266006818
    25 Gainsborough Hill, Pedmore, Stourbridge, DY8 2DU
  2. Allowed23 October 20266012668
    5 Broadlands Drive, Brierley Hill, DY5 1HU
  3. Dismissed23 October 20266010942
    Land Adj 110 Hagley Road, Halesowen, B63 4RL
  4. Allowed14 October 20266010351
    Unit 1 Parkbrook Industrial Estate, Park Street, Lye, DY9 8UH
  5. Dismissed11 September 20266012686
    Trinity Point, New Road, Halesowen, B63 3HY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.