Planning appeal decision
Red Cottage, Mill Lane,, Padworth, West Berkshire, RG7 4JU
Planning appeal 6001664 at Red Cottage, Mill Lane,, Padworth, West Berkshire, RG7 4JU (West Berkshire District Council) was dismissed on 25 February 2026 by Inspector Rose C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the development conserves or enhances the character or appearance of the Aldermaston Wharf Conservation Area and the effect on the character and appearance of the host dwelling as a non-designated heritage asset.
ground floor extension, new pitched porch, loft conversion, new dormers, internal alterations. External red brick to match existing, horizontal timber slats for flat roof dormers, to match existing, and areas of white render
- Authority
- West Berkshire District Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Rose C
- Postcode
- RG7 4JU
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the development conserves or enhances the character or appearance of the Aldermaston Wharf Conservation Area and the effect on the character and appearance of the host dwelling as a non-designated heritage asset
- the effect of the development upon protected species with particular regard to bats
- the effect of the development on flood risk
What decided it
The cumulative effect of alterations to the historic building's character, particularly loss of chimney stacks and introduction of extensive modern materials and forms, caused less than substantial harm to the conservation area and non-designated heritage asset that was not outweighed by the identified public benefits.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- SP7SP8SP9DM11DM28SP6SP5SP11
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 215
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in West Berkshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed29 September 20266012621Land South of Sandhill, Hampstead Norreys Road, Hermitage, Thatcham, RG18 9XU
- Dismissed28 September 2026600935976 Mallard Way, Aldermaston, Reading, RG7 4US
- Dismissed4 September 20266009718Vyners Estate,, Mill Lane, Tidmarsh, Reading, RG8 8EB
- Allowed2 September 20266009448Compounds A, A1, And A4, Youngs Industrial Estate, Paices Hill, Aldermaston, Reading, RG7 4PW
- Dismissed15 June 20266007181Whynot, Eastbury, RG17 7JP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®