Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 May 20266002406

Holden House, 54-68 Oxford Street & 51-58 Rathbone Place, London, W1T 1JU

described as ‘display of a temporary scaffold shroud (in place to correspond with the duration of the façade retention scheme being in situ) featuring an artistic façade treatment representing the retained elevations of Holden House, and incorporating a static, non -illuminated advertisement measuring 26.0m wide by 10.0m high (11.0m on Oxford Street, 11.1m on the chamfered corner, and 3.9m on Rathbone Place)

Authority
City of Westminster Council
Appeal type
other · Listed Building Consent & Conservation Area Consent Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
advertisement · Other minor developments
Inspector
Veevers A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Appeal A: The effect of the proposal on amenity, with particular regard to the listed building and the conservation area
  • Appeal B: Whether the works (a) preserve the Grade II listed building known as Evelyn House, its setting or any features of special architectural or historic interest it possesses and (b) preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Hanway Street Conservation Area

What decided it

The proposed inset advertisement, despite being static and non-illuminated, would add unsympathetic visual clutter to the façades as a result of its size and position, thereby harming the setting and significance of the Grade II listed building and the character and appearance of the Hanway Street Conservation Area, with insufficient public benefits to outweigh this harm.

Framework references: 212, 213, 215

Plan policies cited: Policy 42, Policy 44, Policy 48

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.