Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed11 May 20266003002

Land Adjacent to Grafham Paddocks, Taylors Lane, Buckden, PE19 5UP

Planning appeal 6003002 at Land Adjacent to Grafham Paddocks, Taylors Lane, Buckden, PE19 5UP (Huntingdonshire District Council) was allowed on 11 May 2026 by Inspector Savage K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the site is suitable in principle for residential development, having regard to its location, the proposed land use and the amount of development.

to replace a redundant building with a dwelling

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Savage K
Postcode
PE19 5UP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the site is suitable in principle for residential development, having regard to its location, the proposed land use and the amount of development

What decided it

The Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply triggered the tilted balance under NPPF paragraph 11(d)(ii), and the benefits of housing delivery and effective land use outweighed the minor harm from conflict with countryside policies.

The minor harm from locating development in the countryside and conflicting with Policies LP10 and LP33 was outweighed by the benefits of effective land use, improved site appearance, housing supply boost and modest economic gains, assessed against Framework policies as a whole under the tilted balance.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy LP33Policy LP10Policy LP2Policy LP8
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 8

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

6 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Huntingdonshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed7 October 20266009048
    Land South Of Lodel Farm Overcote Lane, Needingworth, Huntingdon, PE27 4TN
  2. Dismissed29 September 20266008987
    Land South Of 2 Leighton Road, Hamerton, PE28 5QR
  3. Dismissed25 September 20266011882
    Merienda, Greenhill Road, Elton, PE8 6SA
  4. Allowed25 September 20266011362
    15 High Street, Alconbury Weston, Huntingdon, PE28 4JP
  5. Allowed25 September 20266010766
    15 High Street, Alconbury Weston, Huntingdon, PE28 4JP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.