Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 May 20266005592

4 Almond Avenue, Ickenham, UB10 8NA

a single storey side and double storey rear extension as granted 61421/APP/2024/2854 and enlargement of loft space to form habitable accommodation

Authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Clifford E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the roof dormers would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Ickenham Village Conservation Area

What decided it

The roof dormers would fail to preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the conservation area and no public benefits were demonstrated to outweigh the identified harm.

Plan policies cited: Policy D3 of The London Plan (2021), Policy BE1 of the Hillingdon Local Plan: Part One- Strategic Policies (2012), Policy DMHB4 of the Hillingdon Local Plan: Part Two – Development Management Policies (2020), Policy DMHB11 of the Hillingdon Local Plan: Part Two – Development Management Policies (2020), Policy DMHB12 of the Hillingdon Local Plan: Part Two – Development Management Policies (2020), Policy DMHD1 of the Hillingdon Local Plan: Part Two – Development Management Policies (2020)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.