Planning appeal decision
30 Lawefield Avenue, Rothwell, Leeds, LS26 0PT
Planning appeal 6005800 at 30 Lawefield Avenue, Rothwell, Leeds, LS26 0PT (Leeds City Council) was dismissed on 1 June 2026 by Inspector P Hatch, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on highway safety.
retrospective application for brick pillars and double gates to the rear
- Authority
- Leeds City Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- other
- Inspector
- P Hatch
- Postcode
- LS26 0PT
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the development on highway safety
What decided it
The outward-opening gates would require vehicles to wait stationary on the public highway or footway whilst accessing the property, creating an unacceptable highway safety risk particularly at the junction location.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy T2Policy P10Policy GP5
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Leeds City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed27 October 20266012772Lovell Park Hub, Wintoun Street, Leeds, LS7 1DA
- Dismissed20 October 20266012588Index House, 70 Burley Road, Leeds, LS3 1JX
- Dismissed19 October 202660120225 Robins Grove, Rothwell, Leeds, LS26 0LE
- Dismissed16 October 20266010100Vacant Site, Ings Grove, Guiseley, LS20 9FR
- Dismissed15 October 20266010414Ground Floor, 106 Burley Road, Burley, Leeds, LS3 1JP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®