Planning appeal decision
Land Adjacent to 10 and 12 Mount Road, Fiddlers Hamlet, Epping, CM16 7PQ
Planning appeal 6005882 at Land Adjacent to 10 and 12 Mount Road, Fiddlers Hamlet, Epping, CM16 7PQ (Epping Forest District Council) was dismissed on 7 July 2026 by Inspector A Knight, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
the erection of a three-storey detached house
- Authority
- Epping Forest District Council
- Appeal type
- Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- A Knight
- Postcode
- CM16 7PQ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- Whether the proposal would preserve the setting of nearby Grade II listed buildings
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including non-designated heritage assets
- The effect of the proposed development on neighbouring amenity, with particular regard to outlook, daylight and sunlight, and overlooking
- Whether the proposal would provide adequate living conditions and essential facilities for occupiers of the dwelling
- Whether the proposal complies with local and national policy in respect of flooding
What decided it
The proposal fails to satisfy the sequential test for flood risk and would have significantly harmful effects on character and appearance, neighbouring amenity, and living conditions that substantially outweigh the modest housing benefits.
The adverse impacts of allowing the appeal, comprising harmful effects on character and appearance including non-designated heritage assets, significantly harmful effects on neighbouring amenity, inadequate living conditions, and failure to satisfy the sequential flood risk test, significantly and demonstrably outweigh the modest benefits of housing supply and self-build provision.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DM4Policy DM7Policy DM9Policy DM10Policy DM15Policy LP18Policy LP25
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 14Paragraph 154
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Epping Forest District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed28 October 20266011400Larksmead Nursery, St Leonards Road, Nazeing, EN9 2HQ
- Allowed27 October 20266008413Sparks Farm, Nine Ashes Road, Nine Ashes, CM4 0JZ
- Dismissed26 October 20266008699Denver Lodge, Waltham Road, Nazeing, EN9 2EB
- Dismissed23 October 20266013055Millers Farm, Epping Road, Roydon, Harlow, CM19 5DD
- Dismissed21 October 20266010759Spains Hall, Spains Hall Road, Willingale, Ongar, CM5 0QE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®