Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 August 20266005924

High Barn, High Barn Road, Effingham, KT24 5PR

erection of a self-build 2-storey dwelling and single- storey gym building following partial demolition of the existing main dwelling and demolition of the leisure complex buildings. The works seek to retain the main 2-storey part of the original barn conversion and its side car barn addition that includes accommodation in the roof. The proposals also include associated infrastructure and landscaping works and retention of the open pool

Authority
Guildford Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Postcode
KT24 5PR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • Its effect on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The character and appearance of the area with specific regard to ancient woodland and the Surrey Hills National Landscape
  • If the scheme would be inappropriate development, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify it

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would reduce its openness, and the absence of very special circumstances to justify this harm means the appeal must be dismissed.

Substantial weight given to harm from inappropriateness and loss of openness of the Green Belt; neutral matters on character and appearance and national landscape could not outweigh these harms; very special circumstances do not exist to justify the development

Framework references: 154, 189

Plan policies cited: Policy P2, Policy P1, Policy D12 of the Guildford Borough Local Plan: Development Management Policies 2023, Policy ENP-ENV4 of the Effingham Neighbourhood Plan, Policy P9 of the Surrey Hills National Landscape Management Plan 2025

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.