Planning appeal decision
Oakland View ( Land at New House Lane), New House Lane, Winmarleigh, PR3 0JT
Planning appeal 6006824 at Oakland View ( Land at New House Lane), New House Lane, Winmarleigh, PR3 0JT (Wyre) was dismissed on 1 September 2026 by Inspector N Unwin, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development has already begun.
Barn for hay and machinery storage and a 7 metre by 15 metre polytunnel
- Authority
- Wyre
- Appeal type
- major · Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- agricultural
- Inspector
- N Unwin
- Postcode
- PR3 0JT
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposed development has already begun
- Whether the proposed development would be on agricultural land, and reasonably necessary for the purposes of agriculture within the unit
What decided it
The proposed polytunnel had been partially erected prior to submission of the prior approval application, meaning development had commenced before the required prior approval was obtained, taking it outside the scope of permitted development under Schedule 2, Part 6, Class A of the GPDO.
The decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Wyre
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed12 October 20266008565Land off Eidsforth Lane, Barnacre, Preston, PR3 1GZ
- Dismissed9 October 20266008571Cross House Farm, Moss Side Lane, Great Eccleston, PR3 0US
- Dismissed25 September 20266007133Land at Brock, Garstang Road, Bilsborrow, PR3 0BT
- Allowed23 September 2026601209218 Myrtle Avenue, Thornton Cleveleys, FY5 2ZD
- Dismissed15 September 20266008848Beech Grove, Brock Road, Great Eccleston, Preston, PR3 0XD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®