Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed31 July 20266007382

1 Lascombe Lane, Puttenham, GU3 1BA

Planning appeal 6007382 at 1 Lascombe Lane, Puttenham, GU3 1BA (Guildford Borough Council) was dismissed on 31 July 2026 by Inspector John Morrison, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt.

a two-storey part side, single storey rear extensions following demolition of conservatory and creation of lightwell to enable emergency access from basement area

Authority
Guildford Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
John Morrison
Postcode
GU3 1BA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • its effect on the openness of the Green Belt
  • if the scheme would be inappropriate development, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify it

What decided it

The proposal represents disproportionate additions to the original building and would reduce openness of the Green Belt, and no other considerations are sufficient to clearly outweigh this substantial harm.

Substantial weight given to harm to the Green Belt was not outweighed by other considerations including family need, design quality, or lack of harm to the Surrey Hills National Landscape.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy P2 of the Guildford Borough Local Plan 2019
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 154

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

15 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Guildford Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed15 October 20266008529
    Shortland Farm, Guildford Road, Ash, GU12 6DF
  2. Allowed14 October 20266009751
    Land South of Green Lane, West Horsley, GU23 6PQ
  3. Dismissed6 October 20266009810
    Hogs Back Farm Yard, Monkshatch, Compton, GU3 1DL
  4. Allowed5 October 20266012736
    The Cottage, Blanket Mill Farm, Goose Rye Road, Worplesdon, Guildford, GU3 3RQ
  5. Dismissed23 September 20266009962
    Pentire, The Avenue, Worplesdon, GU3 3RA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.