Planning appeal decision
Land at Marles Stud, Epping Road, Epping Upland, Epping, CM16 6PF
Planning appeal 6007798 at Land at Marles Stud, Epping Road, Epping Upland, Epping, CM16 6PF (Epping Forest District Council) was allowed on 10 August 2026 by Inspector L Reid, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
Retention of 3 dwellings with amendments, including removal of plant room, reduction of curtilage, replacement of fencing, revised landscaping and biodiversity enhancements
- Authority
- Epping Forest District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- L Reid
- Postcode
- CM16 6PF
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the development on openness
- The effect of the development on the integrity of the Epping Forest Special Area of Conservation
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development
What decided it
The best interests of the children occupying the dwellings, combined with the human rights implications and the Council's lack of five-year housing land supply, collectively clearly outweighed the substantial weight given to harm to the Green Belt.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and limited harm to openness was clearly outweighed by the best interests of children (significant weight), human rights considerations (moderate weight), housing delivery (limited weight), and other economic and environmental benefits (limited weight), resulting in very special circumstances that justified the development; the tilted balance under paragraph 11(d)(ii) also applied given the Council's inability to demonstrate five-year housing land supply.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DM4Policy SP5Policy DM2Policy DM9
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 58Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Epping Forest District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed28 October 20266011400Larksmead Nursery, St Leonards Road, Nazeing, EN9 2HQ
- Allowed27 October 20266008413Sparks Farm, Nine Ashes Road, Nine Ashes, CM4 0JZ
- Dismissed26 October 20266008699Denver Lodge, Waltham Road, Nazeing, EN9 2EB
- Dismissed23 October 20266013055Millers Farm, Epping Road, Roydon, Harlow, CM19 5DD
- Dismissed21 October 20266010759Spains Hall, Spains Hall Road, Willingale, Ongar, CM5 0QE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®