Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 July 20266010261

Upper St Martin's Lane, Outside No. 6 - 9, London, WC2H 9EF

Planning appeal 6010261 at Upper St Martin's Lane, Outside No. 6 - 9, London, WC2H 9EF (City of Westminster Council) was dismissed on 29 July 2026 by Inspector Andrew McGlone, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Appeal A: whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the Grade II listed buildings of Guild House and The Spirit of Electricity, the Seven Dials Conservation Area and the Covent Garden Conservation Area.

the proposed removal of an existing K6 telephone box, and the deployment of a replacement Street Hub 3 unit

Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
telecoms
Inspector
Andrew McGlone
Postcode
WC2H 9EF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Appeal A: whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the Grade II listed buildings of Guild House and The Spirit of Electricity, the Seven Dials Conservation Area and the Covent Garden Conservation Area
  • Appeal B: the effect of the proposed adverts on amenity, having regard to the heritage assets

What decided it

The less than substantial harm to the Grade II listed buildings and the Seven Dials Conservation Area, combined with the harmful effect of the digital advertisements on amenity and heritage settings, outweighed the public benefits of the digital infrastructure and services.

The public benefits of digital infrastructure, free public services and economic growth did not outweigh the collective and individual harm to the Grade II listed buildings and the Seven Dials Conservation Area.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 42Policy 44Policy 45Policy 48
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 213

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 835 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in City of Westminster Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed28 October 20266012339
    1 Bear Street, London, WC2H 7DZ
  2. Allowed20 October 20266014974
    12 Dryden Street, London, WC2E 9NA
  3. Dismissed20 October 20266013735
    Gloucester Place, Opposite No. 16, London, W1U 8HA
  4. Allowed12 October 20266011165
    Avon House, 360-366 Oxford Street, London, W1C 1JN
  5. Dismissed12 October 20266010357
    Pitch 1696, Wardour Street, London, W1D 6BY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.