Planning appeal decision
White Rose, Curtis Mill Lane, Navestock, Romford, RM4 1HS
Planning appeal 3236140 at White Rose, Curtis Mill Lane, Navestock, Romford, RM4 1HS (Epping Forest District Council) was dismissed on 19 December 2023 by Inspector King T, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt.
material change in use of land to provide for stationing of caravans for residential occupation by Gypsy family with associated hardstanding, fencing/gate, septic tank, gas tank (retrospective)
- Authority
- Epping Forest District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Change of use
- Inspector
- King T
- Postcode
- RM4 1HS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect on the surrounding rural character
- policy and local need for gypsy and traveller accommodation
- whether the site is in a suitable location for such development
- the effect of the development on the integrity of the SAC
- whether the harm, by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations which would amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal
What decided it
The absence of a secured financial contribution (via s.106 Unilateral Undertaking) to mitigate the development's impact on the integrity of the Epping Forest SAC weighed strongly against the proposal and prevented very special circumstances being demonstrated.
substantial harm to the Green Belt and limited harm to character were weighed against significant weight given to traveller pitch need, lack of alternative sites and personal circumstances, but the case tipped against the appellants once the unmitigated harm to the SAC was factored in, as this weighed strongly against the development
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- SP1SP2SP5SP6DM3DM4DM2H4T1DM22
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 148Paragraph 180
- Judgments
- Collins v SSCLG [2013] EWCA Civ 1193
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Epping Forest District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed28 October 20266011400Larksmead Nursery, St Leonards Road, Nazeing, EN9 2HQ
- Allowed27 October 20266008413Sparks Farm, Nine Ashes Road, Nine Ashes, CM4 0JZ
- Dismissed26 October 20266008699Denver Lodge, Waltham Road, Nazeing, EN9 2EB
- Dismissed23 October 20266013055Millers Farm, Epping Road, Roydon, Harlow, CM19 5DD
- Dismissed21 October 20266010759Spains Hall, Spains Hall Road, Willingale, Ongar, CM5 0QE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®