Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 December 20233236140

White Rose, Curtis Mill Lane, Navestock, Romford, RM4 1HS

Planning appeal 3236140 at White Rose, Curtis Mill Lane, Navestock, Romford, RM4 1HS (Epping Forest District Council) was dismissed on 19 December 2023 by Inspector King T, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt.

material change in use of land to provide for stationing of caravans for residential occupation by Gypsy family with associated hardstanding, fencing/gate, septic tank, gas tank (retrospective)

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
caravan-gypsy · Change of use
Inspector
King T
Postcode
RM4 1HS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
  • the effect on the surrounding rural character
  • policy and local need for gypsy and traveller accommodation
  • whether the site is in a suitable location for such development
  • the effect of the development on the integrity of the SAC
  • whether the harm, by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations which would amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal

What decided it

The absence of a secured financial contribution (via s.106 Unilateral Undertaking) to mitigate the development's impact on the integrity of the Epping Forest SAC weighed strongly against the proposal and prevented very special circumstances being demonstrated.

substantial harm to the Green Belt and limited harm to character were weighed against significant weight given to traveller pitch need, lack of alternative sites and personal circumstances, but the case tipped against the appellants once the unmitigated harm to the SAC was factored in, as this weighed strongly against the development

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
SP1SP2SP5SP6DM3DM4DM2H4T1DM22
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 148Paragraph 180
Judgments
Collins v SSCLG [2013] EWCA Civ 1193

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

52 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Epping Forest District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed28 October 20266011400
    Larksmead Nursery, St Leonards Road, Nazeing, EN9 2HQ
  2. Allowed27 October 20266008413
    Sparks Farm, Nine Ashes Road, Nine Ashes, CM4 0JZ
  3. Dismissed26 October 20266008699
    Denver Lodge, Waltham Road, Nazeing, EN9 2EB
  4. Dismissed23 October 20266013055
    Millers Farm, Epping Road, Roydon, Harlow, CM19 5DD
  5. Dismissed21 October 20266010759
    Spains Hall, Spains Hall Road, Willingale, Ongar, CM5 0QE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.