Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed23 December 20213243272

Guildens, Courtenay Avenue, London, N6 4LP

Planning appeal 3243272 at Guildens, Courtenay Avenue, London, N6 4LP (London Borough of Haringey) was allowed on 23 December 2021 by Inspector Cliff D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Highgate Conservation Area.

Demolition of existing dwelling with retention of front facade and erection of replacement two-storey dwelling and associated extension to lower ground floor and the creation of a basement level

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Cliff D
Postcode
N6 4LP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Highgate Conservation Area

What decided it

The substantial redevelopment of Courtenay Avenue has already eroded the uniformity and character of the road, such that the proposed replacement dwelling, retaining the front façade and being commensurate with other recent approvals, would preserve rather than harm the conservation area.

The proposal preserves the character and appearance of the conservation area despite the loss of the existing building, as the building makes only a neutral contribution and the road's character has already been fundamentally altered by cumulative redevelopment.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy HC1 of the London PlanPolicy SP12 of the Haringey Local Plan Strategic Policies 2013 to 2026Policy DM9 of the Haringey Development Management DPD 2017Policy DH1 of the Highgate Neighbourhood Plan 2017Policy DH2 of the Highgate Neighbourhood Plan 2017

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

229 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Haringey

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed14 October 20266008251
    6 Ewart Grove, Wood Green, London, N22 5NX
  2. Allowed13 October 20266010745
    Rakkas 365-369 Green Lanes, Haringey, London, N4 1DY
  3. Dismissed13 October 20266007195
    38 Parkhurst Road, Wood Green, London, N22 8JQ
  4. Dismissed9 October 20266011332
    5 Kimberley Gardens, Tottenham, London, N4 1LB
  5. Dismissed30 September 20263367051
    109 Great Cambridge Road, London, N17 7LN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.