Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed20 August 20213260934

35 High Level Drive, Sydenham, London, SE26 6XT

Planning appeal 3260934 at 35 High Level Drive, Sydenham, London, SE26 6XT (London Borough of Haringey) was dismissed on 20 August 2021 by Inspector Callister V, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the local area.

the demolition of existing garage and erection of a twostorey single family dwelling house with off-street parking for one car

Authority
London Borough of Haringey
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Callister V
Postcode
SE26 6XT

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the local area
  • Whether the appeal proposal constitutes inappropriate development of a residential garden

What decided it

The proposed development would result in significant harm to the character and appearance of the local area by appearing as an incongruous stand-alone development that would not respect the established residential typology of Longton Avenue and would detract from the free-form landscaped character of the High Level Estate.

The benefits of housing development on a small site were outweighed by the significant harm to character and appearance, poor public transport accessibility, and the fundamental conflict with local design and character policies.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Objective 10Policy 15Policy DM30Policy DM32Policy DM33Policy D3Policy H2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 55Paragraph 71Paragraph 130

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

369 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Haringey

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed14 October 20266008251
    6 Ewart Grove, Wood Green, London, N22 5NX
  2. Allowed13 October 20266010745
    Rakkas 365-369 Green Lanes, Haringey, London, N4 1DY
  3. Dismissed13 October 20266007195
    38 Parkhurst Road, Wood Green, London, N22 8JQ
  4. Dismissed9 October 20266011332
    5 Kimberley Gardens, Tottenham, London, N4 1LB
  5. Dismissed30 September 20263367051
    109 Great Cambridge Road, London, N17 7LN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.