Planning appeal decision
Land at Junction of Rising Lane & Birmingham Road, Chadwick End, Solihull, Warwickshire , B93 0DA
Planning appeal 3267521 at Land at Junction of Rising Lane & Birmingham Road, Chadwick End, Solihull, Warwickshire , B93 0DA (Warwick District Council) was dismissed on 9 June 2021 by Inspector Walmsley R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies.
two detached houses, green belt infill, within residential area
- Authority
- Warwick District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Walmsley R
- Postcode
- B93 0DA
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposal on local biodiversity
- if the development is inappropriate, whether the harm, by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, and if so, whether this would amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal failed to meet the limited infill exception under Policy H11 and the Framework because it would not infill a gap between two properties but sit at the end of a row, and the substantial harm to Green Belt openness and character could not be clearly outweighed by the moderate benefits offered.
the moderate benefits of two dwellings and site tidying did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt, loss of openness, harm to character and appearance, and biodiversity loss, so very special circumstances did not exist
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy H11Policy BE1Policy NE3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 145Paragraph 133
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Warwick
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed28 September 20266011601Quince Cottage, 4 The Bank, Stoneleigh, CV8 3DA
- Dismissed23 September 20266006637Land off Oakdene Crescent, Hatton, Warwick, CV35 7BN
- Allowed27 July 20266004371South Side, Wharf Lane, Lapworth, B94 6NR
- Allowed21 July 20266007706Valley House, Valley Lane, Lapworth, B94 6HB
- Allowed13 July 20266003642The Three Horseshoes, Spring Hill, Bubbenhall, CV8 3BD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®