Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 September 20213270113

59 Troydale Drive, Newton Heath, Manchester, M40 2FY

Planning appeal 3270113 at 59 Troydale Drive, Newton Heath, Manchester, M40 2FY (Manchester City Council) was dismissed on 13 September 2021 by Inspector Rafferty C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers at No. 57 and No. 61 Troydale Drive, with particular regard to outlook and overshadowing.

a first floor rear extension

Authority
Manchester City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Rafferty C
Postcode
M40 2FY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers at No. 57 and No. 61 Troydale Drive, with particular regard to outlook and overshadowing
  • The character and appearance of the host dwelling and surrounding area

What decided it

The significant adverse effects on neighbouring living conditions through overbearing impact and overshadowing, combined with the harmful effect on character and appearance through the introduction of an incongruous flat roof, were not outweighed by the appellant's personal circumstances.

The personal circumstances of the appellant as a foster carer requiring additional bathroom facilities were outweighed by the significant adverse impacts on neighbouring living conditions and the character and appearance of the host dwelling and surrounding area.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP1Policy DM1Policy DC1Policy DC1.3

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

59 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Manchester City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed14 October 20266013305
    Beech Court, Willow Bank, Manchester, M14 6XT
  2. Allowed8 October 20266011214
    Basement To First Floor,, 58 - 60 Portland Street,, Manchester,, M1 4QT
  3. Allowed6 October 20266009176
    571 Oldham Road, Manchester, M40 5AF
  4. Dismissed1 October 20266014028
    48 Topfield Road, Manchester, M22 9QN
  5. Dismissed1 October 20266008018
    65 Grimshaw Lane, Manchester, M40 2AX

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.