Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 September 20213271007

36 Roundhill Crescent, BRIGHTON, BN2 3FR

Erection of external spiral stair to rear elevation with alterations to upper-ground floor window to from a doorway; erection of screen to boundary wall and enlargement of raised terrace

Authority
Brighton and Hove City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Gethin T

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of adjoining occupiers, with particular regard to overlooking from the proposed doorway, platform and staircase
  • whether the proposed development, with particular regard to the proposed doorway, platform and staircase, would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Round Hill Conservation Area

What decided it

The proposed development would result in significant loss of privacy for adjoining occupiers due to extensive close-range views from the elevated platform and staircase to their sitting out areas, conflicting with development plan policies protecting living conditions.

The benefits to the appeal site's occupiers (improved access and reduced overlooking of the site) did not outweigh the significant harm to adjoining occupiers' living conditions and the conflict with the development plan.

Framework references: 130

Plan policies cited: Policy QD14, Policy QD27, Policy CP15, Policy HE6

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.