Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 October 20213271480

33 Sirdar Road, London, N22 6QP

Planning appeal 3271480 at 33 Sirdar Road, London, N22 6QP (London Borough of Haringey) was dismissed on 21 October 2021 by Inspector Ford C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the host property and the wider area.

Modification and installation of glazed balustrades and the creation of a roof terrace

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Ford C
Postcode
N22 6QP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the host property and the wider area
  • the effect of the development on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers with particular regard to outlook and privacy

What decided it

The excessive scale and poor design of the balustrade, combined with unacceptable direct overlooking of neighbouring properties, outweighed the benefit of providing outdoor amenity space to a family flat.

The benefit of providing a private roof terrace to a four-bedroom family flat without access to private outdoor space did not outweigh the unacceptable harm to character and appearance and the unacceptable harm to neighbouring privacy.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP11 of the 2013 adopted Haringey Local Plan Strategic Policies 2013-2026Policy DM1 of the Council's 2017 adopted Development Management DPDPolicy DM12 of the Council's 2017 adopted Development Management DPDPolicy D4 of the London PlanPolicy D6 of the London Plan

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

503 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Haringey

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed14 October 20266008251
    6 Ewart Grove, Wood Green, London, N22 5NX
  2. Allowed13 October 20266010745
    Rakkas 365-369 Green Lanes, Haringey, London, N4 1DY
  3. Dismissed13 October 20266007195
    38 Parkhurst Road, Wood Green, London, N22 8JQ
  4. Dismissed9 October 20266011332
    5 Kimberley Gardens, Tottenham, London, N4 1LB
  5. Dismissed30 September 20263367051
    109 Great Cambridge Road, London, N17 7LN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.