Unit 31-32 Peacock Industrial Estate, White Hart Lane, LONDON, N17 8DT

extension on top of the existing property with an additional storey

Authority: London Borough of Haringey
Appeal type: minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure: Written Representations
Development: employment-industrial · Minor retail and services
Inspector: Cresswell C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

whether the proposal would be compatible with local planning policies which seek comprehensive development of the area

What decided it

The proposal would not comply with Policy AAP1 and allocation NT5 because it would not be brought forward as part of the comprehensive masterplanned development required for the area, and would intensify commercial use on land designated for public open space and adjacent to proposed residential development.

The appellant's individual business expansion needs and the Framework's support for economic growth were outweighed by the requirement for comprehensive masterplanned development of the regeneration area to balance economic, social and environmental objectives.

Framework references: 81

Plan policies cited: Policy AAP1, Policy DM55, site allocation NT5

Read the decision letter on the Inspectorate’s site

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

What an account adds

Draw a red line around your site and the appraisal follows.

Heritage. Listed buildings by grade and distance, conservation areas, scheduled monuments, registered parks and gardens, heritage at risk.
Landscape and environment. Green belt, national parks and national landscapes, SSSIs, ancient woodland, SPA, SAC and Ramsar sites, nutrient catchments.
Flooding. Flood zones 2 and 3, surface water, and both again with climate change.
Transport. The 800 metre station catchment and service frequency, bus stops with their weekday frequency, the cycle network, and the Framework’s transport tests measured for the site.

Then the development plan position, the housing land supply as an Inspector last accepted it, and every appeal decided around the site with its letter.

Every English appeal since 2016, with the letter behind it wherever the Inspectorate published one. Searched by meaning as well as by words, with the key case law counted live across the letters.

Casework that chases the deadlines. Applications, appeals and conditions with their statutory dates.

The judgement stays yours. The tool gathers the material and dates it.