®Planning appeal decision
816-818 High Road, London, N17 0EY
Planning appeal 3273663 at 816-818 High Road, London, N17 0EY (London Borough of Haringey) was dismissed on 20 December 2021 by Inspector Tweddle J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the North Tottenham Conservation Area, along with its effect on the setting of the adjacent Grade II listed building.
a ‘new building on land adjacent to 3 Northumberland Park Tottenham N17 0TA
- Authority
- London Borough of Haringey
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Tweddle J
- Postcode
- N17 0EY
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the North Tottenham Conservation Area, along with its effect on the setting of the adjacent Grade II listed building
- The effect of the development on the living conditions of neighbouring residents, with regard to outlook
What decided it
The harmful effects to the significance of both the conservation area and the adjacent listed building, to which great weight was attached, tipped the balance against the appeal scheme and were not outweighed by the modest social and economic benefits of the proposal.
The modest social and economic benefits of additional housing supply and a retail unit were outweighed by the harmful effects to the significance of the conservation area and the adjacent listed building, to which great weight was attached, resulting in the balance tipping against the proposal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy HC1 of the London Plan 2021Policy SP11 of the Haringey Local Plan 2017Policy SP12 of the Haringey Local Plan 2017Policy DM9 of the Haringey Development Management DPD 2017Policy D3 of the London Plan 2021Policy DM1 of the Haringey Development Management DPD 2017
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 200Paragraph 202
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision
More decisions in London Borough of Haringey
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed14 October 202660082516 Ewart Grove, Wood Green, London, N22 5NX
- Allowed13 October 20266010745Rakkas 365-369 Green Lanes, Haringey, London, N4 1DY
- Dismissed13 October 2026600719538 Parkhurst Road, Wood Green, London, N22 8JQ
- Dismissed9 October 202660113325 Kimberley Gardens, Tottenham, London, N4 1LB
- Dismissed30 September 20263367051109 Great Cambridge Road, London, N17 7LN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.