Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed1 April 20223276823

Apps Court Farm , Hurst Road, Walton-on-Thames, KT12 2EG

development comprising 39 no. residential units (including 15 no. affordable units)

Authority
Elmbridge Borough Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Philpott M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposal on the purposes of including land within the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the site and the surrounding area
  • whether or not the proposal would be satisfactory in respect of housing mix and density and make adequate provision for affordable housing
  • whether or not the future occupiers of the development would have satisfactory living conditions having regard to air quality, noise and light pollution
  • the effect of the proposal on biodiversity
  • whether or not the proposal would be satisfactory in respect of flood risk and make adequate provision for sustainable drainage
  • if the development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development

What decided it

The substantial harm to Green Belt openness and the failure to demonstrate very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm to the Green Belt and other identified harms.

the substantial benefits of housing delivery and other considerations do not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to Green Belt openness, moderate harm to Green Belt purposes, harm to character and appearance, failure to secure affordable housing, and unresolved impacts on living conditions and biodiversity

Framework references: 11, 14, 124, 125, 138, 147, 148, 149, 150, 185

Plan policies cited: CS1, CS2, CS3, CS15, CS17, CS19, CS21, CS26, DM2, DM5, DM10, DM17

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.