Planning appeal decision
Studio, 49 Elm Drive, Hove, BN3 7JA
Planning appeal 3277305 at Studio, 49 Elm Drive, Hove, BN3 7JA (Brighton and Hove City Council) was dismissed on 22 November 2021 by Inspector Cramond D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effects of the proposed development on the living conditions of neighbours.
prior approval for the erection of an additional storey to form a first floor extension
- Authority
- Brighton and Hove City Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Cramond D
- Postcode
- BN3 7JA
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effects of the proposed development on the living conditions of neighbours
- The effects of the proposed development on external appearance
What decided it
The unacceptable effects on external appearance, whereby the additional storey would appear top-heavy, ungainly and poorly designed, jarring in the streetscene and out of character with the host building and surrounding area.
The decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Brighton and Hove City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Allowed26 October 20266014224East House, Preston Park Avenue, Brighton, BN1 6HG
- Dismissed6 October 2026601154116 and 16a, Richmond Road, Brighton, BN2 3RN
- Dismissed15 September 2026600726623-24, Brunswick Square, Hove, BN3 1EJ
- Dismissed26 August 2026600958610 Windlesham Road, Brighton & Hove, Brighton, BN1 3AG
- Notice varied and upheld12 August 202633569778 Queens Gardens, Brighton, BN1 4AR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®