Planning appeal decision
Watergate, Watery Lane, Matching Green, HARLOW, CM17 0RQ
a 3-bay car port to front left hand side of property and extension to existing front porch
- Authority
- Epping Forest District Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- other · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Grierson E
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the revised National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies
- The effect on the openness of the Green Belt
- Would the harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The cumulative built form resulting from the proposal would be disproportionate in size compared to the original dwelling (doubling from 122m² to 246m²), failing to meet the exception in paragraph 149 of the Framework and causing substantial harm to Green Belt openness that was not clearly outweighed by other considerations.
Framework references: 149, 148
Plan policies cited: GB2A, GB7A, DM4
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®