Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 October 20223279459

17 Franklin Street, London, N15 6QH

Planning appeal 3279459 at 17 Franklin Street, London, N15 6QH (London Borough of Haringey) was dismissed on 4 October 2022 by Inspector Cryan M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether prior approval should be granted, having regard to the effect of the proposed development on the external appearance of the host dwelling.

Erection of one additional storey immediately above the existing building

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Cryan M
Postcode
N15 6QH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether prior approval should be granted, having regard to the effect of the proposed development on the external appearance of the host dwelling

What decided it

The additional storey would be harmful to the external appearance of the host dwelling by creating a bulky and dominant appearance that is visually jarring and unsympathetic to the modest scale and regular form of the terrace and surrounding street.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP11 of the 2017 Haringey Local PlanPolicy DM1 of the 2017 Haringey Development Management DPDPolicy DM12 of the 2017 Haringey Development Management DPDPolicy D6 of the London Plan 2021
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 12
Judgments
CAB Housing Limited v SSLUHC & Broxbourne; Beis Noeh Limited v SSLUHC & London Borough of Haringey; Mati Rotenberg v SSLUHC & London Borough of Haringey [2022] EWHC 208 (Admin); R (Mawbey) v Lewisham London Borough Council [2019] EWCA Civ 1016

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

745 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Haringey

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed14 October 20266008251
    6 Ewart Grove, Wood Green, London, N22 5NX
  2. Allowed13 October 20266010745
    Rakkas 365-369 Green Lanes, Haringey, London, N4 1DY
  3. Dismissed13 October 20266007195
    38 Parkhurst Road, Wood Green, London, N22 8JQ
  4. Dismissed9 October 20266011332
    5 Kimberley Gardens, Tottenham, London, N4 1LB
  5. Dismissed30 September 20263367051
    109 Great Cambridge Road, London, N17 7LN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.