Planning appeal decision
1 and 2 Shoeluck Cottages, Church Lane, Lambourne, Romford, RM4 1AB
Planning appeal 3285309 at 1 and 2 Shoeluck Cottages, Church Lane, Lambourne, Romford, RM4 1AB (Epping Forest District Council) was dismissed on 31 August 2022 by Inspector Simpson L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, including the effect of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt.
Demolition of existing cottages and erection of replacement dwelling
- Authority
- Epping Forest District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Simpson L
- Postcode
- RM4 1AB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, including the effect of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt
- The effect of the proposed development on protected species (bats)
- If the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The failure to provide evidence of bat surveys to demonstrate that the proposed demolition would not adversely affect protected species, contrary to Framework Paragraph 180(a) and the precautionary principle in Circular 06/2005.
The limited social, economic and environmental benefits of the development were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the adverse impact of being unable to ascertain whether there would be harm to bats, a protected species.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Saved Epping Forest District Local Plan (2006) Policy GB2ASaved Epping Forest District Local Plan (2006) Policy GB7AEmerging Local Plan (Submission version 2017) Policy DM4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 138Paragraph 147Paragraph 149Paragraph 180
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Epping Forest District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed28 October 20266011400Larksmead Nursery, St Leonards Road, Nazeing, EN9 2HQ
- Allowed27 October 20266008413Sparks Farm, Nine Ashes Road, Nine Ashes, CM4 0JZ
- Dismissed26 October 20266008699Denver Lodge, Waltham Road, Nazeing, EN9 2EB
- Dismissed23 October 20266013055Millers Farm, Epping Road, Roydon, Harlow, CM19 5DD
- Dismissed21 October 20266010759Spains Hall, Spains Hall Road, Willingale, Ongar, CM5 0QE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®