Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed19 August 20223285959

Silver Bearch, Tysea Hill, Stapleford Abbotts, Romford, RM4 1JP

retain front wall to highways”. The application was submitted retrospectively, and the development was in place at the time of my site visit. I have considered the appeal on a retrospective basis and have omitted “retain” from the development description. 4. The Council describe the development as including gates, in addition to the front wall. This is not disputed by the appellant. In my

Authority
Epping Forest District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Not Applicable
Inspector
Dade E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the gates on highway safety

What decided it

The low traffic and pedestrian movements in the area, combined with good visibility and the commonplace nature of short-term vehicle stops in residential areas, mean the gates would not have a harmful effect on highway safety.

Plan policies cited: saved policy ST4 of the Epping Forest District Local Plan Alterations 2006, policy T1 of the emerging Epping Forest District Local Plan (submission version 2017)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.