Planning appeal decision
Land off Colliery Road, Brereton, Rugeley, Staffordshire, WS15 1QR
Planning appeal 3286256 at Land off Colliery Road, Brereton, Rugeley, Staffordshire, WS15 1QR (Cannock Chase District Council) was allowed on 23 June 2023 by Inspector Thandi B, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether or not the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt.
Change of use of land to mixed use for stabling/keeping of horses (existing) and as a residential caravan site for one gypsy family with two caravans, including no more than one static caravan/mobile home
- Authority
- Cannock Chase District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Minor traveller and caravan pitches
- Inspector
- Thandi B
- Postcode
- WS15 1QR
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether or not the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt
- The effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
- The effect of the development upon the Cannock Chase Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB)
- The effect of the development on the Cannock Chase Special Area of Conservation (SAC)
- Whether or not the development is located within an appropriate location having regard to access to services and facilities
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development
What decided it
The significant weight given to the best interests of the appellant's school-aged children, his expectant daughter and her unborn child, and the substantial weight given to the human rights implications of a roadside existence, were sufficient to outweigh the identified Green Belt and AONB harm and justify a personal permission.
The substantial harm from inappropriate development and loss of openness in the Green Belt, together with significant harm to the AONB, were outweighed by the significant weight attached to the personal circumstances and best interests of the children and unborn child, alongside moderate weight given to unmet gypsy and traveller need and economic benefits, justifying a personal permission.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CP 14
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 176Paragraph 80Paragraph 105
- Judgments
- Braintree DC v SSCLG, Greyread Ltd & Granville Developments Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 610
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Cannock Chase
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed1 May 20266003334Land to the Rear of 49, Etchinghill Road, Rugeley, Staffs, WS15 2LW
- Dismissed25 March 20253348165Stonehouse Barn Penkridge Bank Road, Rugeley, WS15 2UE
- Dismissed15 October 20243343619Forest Lodge Birches Valley, Rugeley, WS15 2UQ
- Dismissed19 July 2024333509271 Hayfield Hill, Cannock Wood, Staffordshire , WS15 4RT
- Dismissed20 July 20223289525Land South East of New Hayes Farm, Holly Hill Road, Cannock Wood, WS15 4SD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®