®Planning appeal decision
Land to the Rear of 49, Etchinghill Road, Rugeley, Staffs, WS15 2LW
Planning appeal 6003334 at Land to the Rear of 49, Etchinghill Road, Rugeley, Staffs, WS15 2LW (Cannock Chase District Council) was dismissed on 1 May 2026 by Inspector Barton P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site is suitable for residential development, having regard to its location, the proposed land use and the amount of development, with particular regard to whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt.
residential development comprising of 1 or 2 dwellings
- Authority
- Cannock Chase District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Barton P
- Postcode
- WS15 2LW
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the site is suitable for residential development, having regard to its location, the proposed land use and the amount of development, with particular regard to whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including the Cannock Chase National Landscape and the effect on protected trees
- whether other considerations clearly outweigh the harm to the Green Belt and any other harm so as to amount to very special circumstances
What decided it
The substantial harm to the openness of the Green Belt and the unacceptable effect on the character and appearance of the area, including the National Landscape, are not clearly outweighed by other considerations, and very special circumstances do not exist.
The substantial weight given to harm to the Green Belt and harm to character and appearance of the area and National Landscape outweighed the limited weight afforded to housing delivery and economic benefits, resulting in dismissal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- CCDLP Policy SO7.6CCDLP Policy SO1.2CCDLP Policy SO7.4CCDLP Policy SO7.5
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision
More decisions in Cannock Chase
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed25 March 20253348165Stonehouse Barn Penkridge Bank Road, Rugeley, WS15 2UE
- Dismissed15 October 20243343619Forest Lodge Birches Valley, Rugeley, WS15 2UQ
- Dismissed19 July 2024333509271 Hayfield Hill, Cannock Wood, Staffordshire , WS15 4RT
- Allowed23 June 20233286256Land off Colliery Road, Brereton, Rugeley, Staffordshire, WS15 1QR
- Dismissed20 July 20223289525Land South East of New Hayes Farm, Holly Hill Road, Cannock Wood, WS15 4SD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.