Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 November 20223289508

110A Priory Road, London, N8 7HP

Planning appeal 3289508 at 110A Priory Road, London, N8 7HP (London Borough of Haringey) was dismissed on 15 November 2022 by Inspector McDonagh C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area and on the amenity value of Priory Common Orchard.

Demolition of the existing building and erection of a 3.5- storey building comprising nursery use (Use Class E) at ground floor and residential use above (Use Class C3), with associated works to provide cycle and refuse storage

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
McDonagh C
Postcode
N8 7HP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area and on the amenity value of Priory Common Orchard

What decided it

The significant harm to the character and appearance of the area and the amenity value of Priory Common Orchard substantially and demonstrably outweighed the limited benefits of three new dwellings and improved nursery facilities when assessed against the Framework.

The benefits of three new dwellings with sustainable materials and technology, improved nursery facilities, and construction employment were limited and were substantially outweighed by significant harm to character and appearance and public amenity value of the open space.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM1Policy DM12Policy SP11Policy D4Policy DM20Policy SP13Policy G6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

412 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Haringey

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed14 October 20266008251
    6 Ewart Grove, Wood Green, London, N22 5NX
  2. Allowed13 October 20266010745
    Rakkas 365-369 Green Lanes, Haringey, London, N4 1DY
  3. Dismissed13 October 20266007195
    38 Parkhurst Road, Wood Green, London, N22 8JQ
  4. Dismissed9 October 20266011332
    5 Kimberley Gardens, Tottenham, London, N4 1LB
  5. Dismissed30 September 20263367051
    109 Great Cambridge Road, London, N17 7LN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.