Planning appeal decision
Land North of Dowding Way, Waltham Abbey, EN9 3RU
Planning appeal 3289760 at Land North of Dowding Way, Waltham Abbey, EN9 3RU (Epping Forest District Council) was dismissed on 23 June 2022 by Inspector Gould G, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effects of the development on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt.
The erection of 1 no. building for use as a warehouse (Use Class B8) with ancillary accommodation and photo studio (sui generis) with gatehouse, sprinkler tanks and pumphouse, substation, fuel island, vehicle wash, attenuation ponds and associated works, 1 no. multi-storey car park with associated bridge link, along with access and servicing arrangements, landscaping and external amenity areas, roof- mounted photovoltaic array, creation of signalised junction to A121 and shared foot and cycle links including a connection to the Public Right of Way network
- Authority
- Epping Forest District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- employment-industrial · Major general industry/storage/warehousing
- Inspector
- Gould G
- Postcode
- EN9 3YX
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effects of the development on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
- The effects of the development on the character and appearance of the area
- Whether the development would make appropriate provision for a DRT bus service
- Whether the harm by reason of the inappropriateness of the development within the Green Belt, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it
What decided it
The harm to the character and appearance of the area from the height, scale and siting of the main building close to the M25, combined with Green Belt harm, was not clearly outweighed by the development's benefits, so very special circumstances were not established.
The Green Belt harm (reduced from substantial to moderate weight) together with very substantial harm to the character and appearance of the area was not clearly outweighed by the moderate, significant and substantial benefits of sustainable transport provision, economic/employment benefits and the absence of harm to the SAC, so very special circumstances did not exist and permission was refused.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GB2APolicy GB7APolicy DBE1Policy DBE4Policy NC1Policy ST1Policy ST2Policy ST3Policy T1Policy E1Policy P3Policy DM9Policy DM2Policy DM22
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 48Paragraph 126Paragraph 130Paragraph 137Paragraph 138Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 149Paragraph 150
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Epping Forest District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed28 October 20266011400Larksmead Nursery, St Leonards Road, Nazeing, EN9 2HQ
- Allowed27 October 20266008413Sparks Farm, Nine Ashes Road, Nine Ashes, CM4 0JZ
- Dismissed26 October 20266008699Denver Lodge, Waltham Road, Nazeing, EN9 2EB
- Dismissed23 October 20266013055Millers Farm, Epping Road, Roydon, Harlow, CM19 5DD
- Dismissed21 October 20266010759Spains Hall, Spains Hall Road, Willingale, Ongar, CM5 0QE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®