Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 October 20223294507

Land between Oakhaven and Lynton Croft, Rising Lane , Baddesley Clinton , B93 0DB

erection of two new dwellings

Authority
Warwick District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Marigold O

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • If the proposal is inappropriate, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal fails to constitute limited infilling under Policy H11(b) as the gap is not small and the frontage is not largely uninterrupted, and would cause substantial harm to Green Belt openness and rural character that is not outweighed by other considerations.

Framework references: 149

Plan policies cited: Policy H11, Policy H11(b), Policy H11(c)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.