Planning appeal decision
Scarthingwell , Tadcaster , LS24 9PF
Planning appeal 3294868 at Scarthingwell , Tadcaster , LS24 9PF (Selby District Council *) was dismissed on 7 February 2023 by Inspector Woodward M, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies, and the effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of including land in the Green Belt.
erection of 99 holiday lodges with reception building, reconfiguration of the golf course and use of building as a golf academy and greenkeeper’s store
- Authority
- Selby District Council *
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- leisure-sport · Other Major Developments
- Inspector
- Woodward M
- Postcode
- LS24 9PF
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies, and the effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of including land in the Green Belt
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- The effect of the proposal on the setting of heritage assets including Grade II Listed 'East range of farmbuildings at Scarthingwell Hall Farm' (Ref: 1148446), 'West range of farmbuildings at Scarthingwell Hall Farm' (Ref: 1261614), and 'Barn at Scarthingwell Hall Farm' (Ref: 1253732)
- The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of existing residents
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm (if found), would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal
What decided it
The identified benefits, particularly the club's viability case, did not clearly outweigh the significant harm to the Green Belt so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal.
The moderate social/economic benefits, significant biodiversity benefits, and limited environmental/course-improvement benefits did not clearly outweigh the substantial Green Belt harm (and, if included, the heritage harm), so very special circumstances did not exist and the balance tipped against the proposal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Saved Policy ENV1Policy SP18Policy SP19Policy SP3Policy ENV15Policy ENV17
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 149Paragraph 150Paragraph 137Paragraph 138Paragraph 199Paragraph 200Paragraph 202
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Selby District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Notice varied and upheld6 June 20253350328Fulham Farm Cottage, Fulham Lane , Whitley , North Yorkshire , DN14 0JL
- Dismissed17 April 20243322188Land to the Rear of The Lodge, 23 Selby Road, Riccall, Selby, YO19 6QP
- Dismissed27 February 20243321128Manor Farm, Main Street, Womersley, North Yorkshire, DN6 9AY
- Dismissed21 February 20243322648Station House, Wetherby Road, Newton Kyme, Tadcaster, LS24 9LT
- Dismissed28 November 20233315664Balne Moor Lodge, Balne Moor Road, Balne, DN14 0EL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®