Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed20 September 20223294872

109-111 Craven Park Road, London, N15 6BL

Planning appeal 3294872 at 109-111 Craven Park Road, London, N15 6BL (London Borough of Haringey) was dismissed on 20 September 2022 by Inspector Robbie K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development would accord with the relevant local guidance regarding the construction of additional floors on terraced buildings.

erection of Type 3 Loft to 109 and 111 Craven Park Road to provide for a new flat C3”

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Robbie K
Postcode
N15 6BL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development would accord with the relevant local guidance regarding the construction of additional floors on terraced buildings
  • The appearance of the host property and the surrounding area
  • The living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring property at 113 Craven Park Road with particular regard to loss of outlook

What decided it

The proposal would conflict with the specific aims of the SPD by creating a self-contained flat rather than providing additional accommodation for a larger family unit in an existing single-family house, and would result in unacceptable harm to the appearance of the area by disrupting the balance and rhythm of the terrace.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
House Extensions in South Tottenham Supplementary Planning Document First Revision (Adopted) 2013Haringey Local Plan Strategic Policies 2013 Policy SP11Development Management Policies DPD 2017 Policy DM1London Plan 2021 Policy D4London Plan 2021 Policy D6

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

667 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Haringey

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed14 October 20266008251
    6 Ewart Grove, Wood Green, London, N22 5NX
  2. Allowed13 October 20266010745
    Rakkas 365-369 Green Lanes, Haringey, London, N4 1DY
  3. Dismissed13 October 20266007195
    38 Parkhurst Road, Wood Green, London, N22 8JQ
  4. Dismissed9 October 20266011332
    5 Kimberley Gardens, Tottenham, London, N4 1LB
  5. Dismissed30 September 20263367051
    109 Great Cambridge Road, London, N17 7LN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.