Planning appeal decision
Garage Site Next to 73, Dungworth Green, Sheffield, S6 6HE
Planning appeal 3295735 at Garage Site Next to 73, Dungworth Green, Sheffield, S6 6HE (Sheffield City Council) was dismissed on 4 November 2022 by Inspector Rafiq F, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the development plan and the National Planning Policy Framework.
the erection of a single dwelling
- Authority
- Sheffield City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Rafiq F
- Postcode
- S6 6HE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the development plan and the National Planning Policy Framework
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on the purposes of the Green Belt
- if the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The proposal would have a greater impact on the openness of the Green Belt than the existing development and would not meet the exceptions at Framework paragraph 149(e) or (g), making it inappropriate development for which the moderate benefits do not constitute very special circumstances.
The substantial weight given to Green Belt harm and other harm was not clearly outweighed by the moderate weight attached to housing delivery, economic and social benefits, high-quality design, and visual improvement of the landscape.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- UDP Policy GE1UDP Policy GE2UDP Policy GE3UDP Policy GE5
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 149Paragraph 149eParagraph 149gParagraph 148Paragraph 138Paragraph 11
- Judgments
- [2018] EWCA Civ 1519 R Tate v Northumberland County Council and Susan Leffers-Smith
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Sheffield City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Split Decision23 July 20263377264Samehill Farm and Land to East , Hagg Lane, Sheffield, S10 5PX
- Allowed21 July 20266004273Site Of Former 27 Skew Hill, Sheffield, S35 8QW
- Dismissed8 July 20266005492Station Pastures, Land Between Loicher Lane and Butterthwaite Lane, Sheffield, S35 9WA
- Allowed18 February 2026337532923 Whitworth Road, Sheffield, S10 3HD
- Dismissed18 February 20263374906Rainbow Forge Primary Academy, Beighton Road, Hackenthorpe, Sheffield, S12 4LQ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®