Planning appeal decision
Land Rear of 9-23, Sky End Lane , Hordle , SO41 0HJ
Planning appeal 3296381 at Land Rear of 9-23, Sky End Lane , Hordle , SO41 0HJ (New Forest District Council) was dismissed on 11 April 2023 by Inspector O'Doherty A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
described on the application form as, “Demolition of existing buildings and construction of up to 6 dwellings utilising existing access from Sky End Lane (matters of layout, appearance and landscape reserved)
- Authority
- New Forest District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- O'Doherty A
- Postcode
- SO41 0HJ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- whether the appeal site would be a suitable location for new housing, with particular regard to the settlement strategy for the area
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposal on highway safety, including the safety of vulnerable road users
- the effect of the proposal on ecology, including protected species
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The substantial harm to the Green Belt through inappropriateness and loss of openness, combined with unsuitability of location, character harm, highway safety deficiencies and unresolved ecology concerns, was not clearly outweighed by the moderate benefits of housing delivery and site remediation, so very special circumstances did not exist.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness, considerable weight against unsuitability of location, significant weight against character and highway safety harm, and great weight against unresolved ecology concerns, were not clearly outweighed by moderate weight for housing delivery and site remediation benefits, so the proposal failed the very special circumstances test.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy ENV2Policy STR3Policy STR4Policy HOU5Policy HOU2Policy ENV3Policy CCC2Policy DM20Policy DM2Policy STR1GBE01-Location of the Hordle Village Design StatementGA03-Alterations and conversion
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 15Paragraph 110Paragraph 111Paragraph 138Paragraph 148Paragraph 149
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in New Forest District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed28 May 20266002232Land Rear of Kona, Sway Road, Lymington, SO41 8LR
- Allowed29 April 20266005105Land at New Lane, Milford-on-Sea, SO41 0UQ
- Dismissed19 March 20266003160Little Ramley, 115 Ramley Road, Pennington, Hampshire, SO41 8LH
- Allowed13 March 20266002931Velood, Barnes Lane, Milford on Sea, Hampshire, SO41 0RR
- Dismissed18 July 20253363504Land Adjacent to 192 Gore Road, New Milton, Hampshire, BH25 5NQ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®