Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 April 20233296381

Land Rear of 9-23, Sky End Lane , Hordle , SO41 0HJ

Planning appeal 3296381 at Land Rear of 9-23, Sky End Lane , Hordle , SO41 0HJ (New Forest District Council) was dismissed on 11 April 2023 by Inspector O'Doherty A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

described on the application form as, “Demolition of existing buildings and construction of up to 6 dwellings utilising existing access from Sky End Lane (matters of layout, appearance and landscape reserved)

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
O'Doherty A
Postcode
SO41 0HJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • whether the appeal site would be a suitable location for new housing, with particular regard to the settlement strategy for the area
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposal on highway safety, including the safety of vulnerable road users
  • the effect of the proposal on ecology, including protected species
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The substantial harm to the Green Belt through inappropriateness and loss of openness, combined with unsuitability of location, character harm, highway safety deficiencies and unresolved ecology concerns, was not clearly outweighed by the moderate benefits of housing delivery and site remediation, so very special circumstances did not exist.

The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness, considerable weight against unsuitability of location, significant weight against character and highway safety harm, and great weight against unresolved ecology concerns, were not clearly outweighed by moderate weight for housing delivery and site remediation benefits, so the proposal failed the very special circumstances test.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy ENV2Policy STR3Policy STR4Policy HOU5Policy HOU2Policy ENV3Policy CCC2Policy DM20Policy DM2Policy STR1GBE01-Location of the Hordle Village Design StatementGA03-Alterations and conversion
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 15Paragraph 110Paragraph 111Paragraph 138Paragraph 148Paragraph 149

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

34 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in New Forest District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed28 May 20266002232
    Land Rear of Kona, Sway Road, Lymington, SO41 8LR
  2. Allowed29 April 20266005105
    Land at New Lane, Milford-on-Sea, SO41 0UQ
  3. Dismissed19 March 20266003160
    Little Ramley, 115 Ramley Road, Pennington, Hampshire, SO41 8LH
  4. Allowed13 March 20266002931
    Velood, Barnes Lane, Milford on Sea, Hampshire, SO41 0RR
  5. Dismissed18 July 20253363504
    Land Adjacent to 192 Gore Road, New Milton, Hampshire, BH25 5NQ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.