Planning appeal decision
LAND REAR OF 9-23, Sky End Lane , Hordle , SO41 0HJ
described on the application form as, “Demolition of existing buildings and construction of up to 6 dwellings utilising existing access from Sky End Lane (matters of layout, appearance and landscape reserved)
- Authority
- New Forest District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- O'Doherty A
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- whether the appeal site would be a suitable location for new housing, with particular regard to the settlement strategy for the area
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposal on highway safety, including the safety of vulnerable road users
- the effect of the proposal on ecology, including protected species
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The substantial harm to the Green Belt through inappropriateness and loss of openness, combined with unsuitability of location, character harm, highway safety deficiencies and unresolved ecology concerns, was not clearly outweighed by the moderate benefits of housing delivery and site remediation, so very special circumstances did not exist.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness, considerable weight against unsuitability of location, significant weight against character and highway safety harm, and great weight against unresolved ecology concerns, were not clearly outweighed by moderate weight for housing delivery and site remediation benefits, so the proposal failed the very special circumstances test.
Framework references: 11, 15, 110, 111, 138, 148, 149
Plan policies cited: Policy ENV2, Policy STR3, Policy STR4, Policy HOU5, Policy HOU2, Policy ENV3, Policy CCC2, Policy DM20, Policy DM2, Policy STR1, GBE01-Location of the Hordle Village Design Statement, GA03-Alterations and conversion
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®