Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 August 20223297580

Garage Site Between 4-5 Malmesbury Close, Upper Wortley, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS12 4BW

Planning appeal 3297580 at Garage Site Between 4-5 Malmesbury Close, Upper Wortley, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS12 4BW (Leeds City Council) was dismissed on 9 August 2022 by Inspector Jones H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

erection of a detached two bedroom, two storey dwelling house

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Jones H
Postcode
LS12 4BW

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • the living conditions of future occupiers
  • highway safety with specific regard to access and parking

What decided it

The proposed development's unconventional detached design with a staggered multi-level roofscape would appear markedly out of place and unacceptably reduce the quality and consistency of the street scene, causing harm to character and appearance that cannot be overcome by the absence of harm on other issues.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy P10 of the Leeds City Core Strategy 2014, as amendedPolicy GP5 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan, as reviewed 2006Policy T2 of the Leeds City Core Strategy
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 126Paragraph 130Paragraph 134Paragraph 111Paragraph 112

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

56 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Leeds City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed1 October 20266011321
    Land to the Rear of, 14 to 16 Cross Hills Kippax, Kippax, LS25 7JP
  2. Dismissed21 September 20266009737
    12 Hyde Park Terrace, Leeds, LS6 1BJ
  3. Dismissed4 September 20266010416
    Stonewood, Almshouse Hill, Leeds, LS23 6QX
  4. Allowed3 September 20266007907
    9 Vinery Grove, Richmond Hill, Leeds, LS9 9LT
  5. Dismissed14 August 20266006204
    193 Easterly Road, Leeds, LS8 2RB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.