Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 April 20243301273

121 Lansdowne Road, London, N17 0NN

Planning appeal 3301273 at 121 Lansdowne Road, London, N17 0NN (London Borough of Haringey) was dismissed on 12 April 2024 by Inspector Townend K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the property is suitable for conversion in principle, having regard to the development plan policies and the availability of family accommodation in the area.

sub-division of the existing building into one 3-bedroom and one 1-bedroom self-contained flats at first and second floor levels incorporating internal alterations thereto to ensure compliance with the Council’s internal space standards

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Townend K
Postcode
N17 0NN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the property is suitable for conversion in principle, having regard to the development plan policies and the availability of family accommodation in the area
  • whether the proposed development would provide adequate living conditions for future occupants, with particular reference to the size of the internal accommodation of the flat proposed within the roof space

What decided it

The original dwelling's gross internal floor space of less than 120 square metres fails to meet the threshold in Policy DM16 of the Development Management DPD, making the property unsuitable for conversion in principle within the Family Housing Protection Zone.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM16Policy SP2Policy H10Policy D6Policy D1Policy H1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

342 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Haringey

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed14 October 20266008251
    6 Ewart Grove, Wood Green, London, N22 5NX
  2. Allowed13 October 20266010745
    Rakkas 365-369 Green Lanes, Haringey, London, N4 1DY
  3. Dismissed13 October 20266007195
    38 Parkhurst Road, Wood Green, London, N22 8JQ
  4. Dismissed9 October 20266011332
    5 Kimberley Gardens, Tottenham, London, N4 1LB
  5. Dismissed30 September 20263367051
    109 Great Cambridge Road, London, N17 7LN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.