Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed2 October 20233302547

Land off Arlingham Mews, Sun Street, Waltham Abbey, EN9 1ED

Planning appeal 3302547 at Land off Arlingham Mews, Sun Street, Waltham Abbey, EN9 1ED (Epping Forest District Council) was dismissed on 2 October 2023 by Inspector Ellison H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether satisfactory living conditions would be provided for future residents, with particular regard to outlook, privacy and internal space.

the change of use of the ground floor retail units (A1) to 1 x studio and 2 x 1 bed units (C3)

Authority
Epping Forest District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Ellison H
Postcode
EN9 1ED

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether satisfactory living conditions would be provided for future residents, with particular regard to outlook, privacy and internal space
  • The effect of the proposal on the vitality and viability of Waltham Abbey Town Centre
  • The effect of the proposal on the character or appearance of the Waltham Abbey Conservation Area
  • The effect of the proposal on the Epping Forest Special Area of Conservation

What decided it

The proposal would fail to provide satisfactory living conditions for future residents in terms of outlook and privacy, conflicting with Policy DM10 of the Local Plan and paragraph 130 of the NPPF.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM10Policy E2Policy P3Policy DM7Policy DM9
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 130

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

64 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Epping Forest District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Allowed29 October 20266015320
    55 Weald Hall Lane, Epping, CM16 6NB
  2. Dismissed28 October 20266011400
    Larksmead Nursery, St Leonards Road, Nazeing, EN9 2HQ
  3. Dismissed27 October 20266011962
    Russell Cottage,, Coopersale Hall, Fluxs Lane,, Epping,, CM16 7PE
  4. Dismissed27 October 20266011961
    Russell Cottage, Coopersale Hall, Fluxs Lane, Epping, CM16 7PE
  5. Allowed27 October 20266008413
    Sparks Farm, Nine Ashes Road, Nine Ashes, CM4 0JZ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.