Planning appeal decision
Land at Ash Grove, Ash Grove, Otley, Leeds, LS21 3EN
Planning appeal 3304440 at Land at Ash Grove, Ash Grove, Otley, Leeds, LS21 3EN (Leeds City Council) was dismissed on 30 November 2022 by Inspector Wraight G, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would accord with the development plan with reference to greenspace allocations.
the construction of 2 No. dwellings
- Authority
- Leeds City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Wraight G
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would accord with the development plan with reference to greenspace allocations
- Whether the proposal would provide a safe and suitable access
- The effect of the proposal on trees and hedgerows
- Whether the proposal would make adequate provision for biodiversity net gain
What decided it
The cumulative and unresolved conflicts with development plan policies on trees/hedgerows, highway safety (fire tender access), and the absence of a mechanism to secure biodiversity net gain outweighed the limited benefits of the two dwellings.
The conflict with the development plan (trees and hedgerows, fire tender access, and biodiversity net gain) was not outweighed by the limited benefits of providing two new dwellings, so the appeal was dismissed.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy G6Policy T2Saved Policy GP5Saved Policy LD1Policy Land 2Policy G9Policy G1Saved Policy N9Saved Policy N24Saved Policy N25
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 174Paragraph 180
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Leeds City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed1 October 20266011321Land to the Rear of, 14 to 16 Cross Hills Kippax, Kippax, LS25 7JP
- Dismissed21 September 2026600973712 Hyde Park Terrace, Leeds, LS6 1BJ
- Dismissed4 September 20266010416Stonewood, Almshouse Hill, Leeds, LS23 6QX
- Allowed3 September 202660079079 Vinery Grove, Richmond Hill, Leeds, LS9 9LT
- Dismissed14 August 20266006204193 Easterly Road, Leeds, LS8 2RB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®