Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 December 20223306018

9 Elm Road, Portslade, BRIGHTON, BN41 1SA

the erection of a rear dormer onto outrigger roofslope incorporating 2no rear rooflights

Authority
Brighton and Hove City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Cramond D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host property and locality

What decided it

The proposed dormer would be poorly designed, incongruous, and would unacceptably harm the character and appearance of the host property and locality in conflict with development plan policies.

Plan policies cited: QD14, CP12, DM21

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.