Planning appeal decision
ECP Car Park, Miller Street, Manchester, M4 4DY
- Authority
- Manchester City Council
- Appeal type
- other · Advert Discontinuance
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- advertisement · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Kean G
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The main issue in Appeal A is whether the continued use of the site for the display of an advertisement would cause substantial injury to the amenity of the locality.
- The main issue for Appeal B is whether the continued use of the site for the display of an advertisement would cause substantial injury to the amenity of the locality or present a danger to members of the public.
What decided it
The scale of each advertisement structure relative to its surrounding built context determined the outcome: modest and non-dominant in Appeal A (no substantial injury), but very large and incongruous against the new Swan House development in Appeal B (substantial injury to amenity).
Plan policies cited: Policy EN1, Policy DM1, Policy SP1, Policy DC15.1, Policy DC15.2, Policy E3.3, Policy CC9, Policy DC18, Policy DC19, Policy DC15.3
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®