Planning appeal decision
Units 9 & 42, 1 D Panorama House, Vale Road, Hove, BN41 1BA
Planning appeal 3312732 at Units 9 & 42, 1 D Panorama House, Vale Road, Hove, BN41 1BA (Brighton and Hove City Council) was dismissed on 3 November 2023 by Inspector Price A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would provide a satisfactory standard of accommodation for future occupiers, with particular regard to outlook.
described on the application form as ‘conversion of units 9 and 42 into two self-contained flats. Removal of existing front door and installation of a new door and window to unit 42. Provision of hedging surrounding the new window to unit 42. Provision of obscure glazed screening at rear of Unit 9
- Authority
- Brighton and Hove City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Price A
- Postcode
- BN41 1BA
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposed development would provide a satisfactory standard of accommodation for future occupiers, with particular regard to outlook
- the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to outlook and amenity space
- the effect of the proposed development on existing access
- the effect of the proposed development on character and appearance
What decided it
The significant harm to the standard of accommodation for Unit 9 and to the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, particularly loss of outlook, could not be outweighed by the limited housing and economic benefits in the context of the tilted balance.
The benefits of housing delivery and economic gains were outweighed by the significant harm to standard of accommodation and living conditions of neighbouring occupiers.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DM20Policy DM33Policy DM1Policy DM21Policy DM22
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Brighton and Hove City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Allowed26 October 20266014224East House, Preston Park Avenue, Brighton, BN1 6HG
- Dismissed6 October 2026601154116 and 16a, Richmond Road, Brighton, BN2 3RN
- Dismissed15 September 2026600726623-24, Brunswick Square, Hove, BN3 1EJ
- Dismissed26 August 2026600958610 Windlesham Road, Brighton & Hove, Brighton, BN1 3AG
- Notice varied and upheld12 August 202633569778 Queens Gardens, Brighton, BN1 4AR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®